The History Channel recently aired a special, just before Christmas ('tis the season), entitled Proving God. Here’s the description from History Channel:
"Proving God For centuries, science and faith have been polarized on some of the most fundamental questions in the universe, sometimes with deadly consequences. But as mankind seeks to answer the ultimate question--whether God exists--religion and science have joined in an unlikely alliance. Can new scientific discoveries and digital age technology reveal tangible proof of God? From the far reaches of the cosmos to the inner working of the human mind, scientists and believers around the world are using science to open new frontiers in this ultimate quest."
Monsignor Georges Henri Joseph Édouard Lemaître |
What surprised me most though was not the sadly usual jump over the actual history of these issues by the History Channel (the network that also hosts Ancient Aliens, UFO Hunters and my personal favorite Swamp Hunters) but the manner by which the logic of the show followed. The program sets out that it will, through modern science, prove/disprove empirically the existence of God. In the language of the show itself, to quantitatively show God and find Him. This philosophy sadly leads to nowhere. In saying that everything (God included) can be proven/disproven scientifically is in itself not scientifically verifiable therefore it is invalid. The sciences rest on the faith of scientists that the empirical world is to our limited ability, intelligible. It rests on the preconceived notion that the universe is ordered and based on laws that are to some small degree measurable by our intellect.
The program shows the natural tendency of man, constantly trying to reduce God to something among things rather then the Transcendent force through which all things exist. It is the futile attempt to find God and neatly put Him in a box. The episode ended with scientists trying to find the God particle and from the God particle be able to create the theory of everything. While science is a great progress of man in so many regards I can hardly imagine anything more laughable then the idea that a finite being (i.e. man) can somehow comprehend all of existence and indeed the Infinite.
Science should indeed grow as much as it can in order to authentically grasp the truth, however it cannot do this when sacrificing reason.
Puzzled why history channel interviews 4 religious scientists. 93% of the scientific population in the US don't believe in God and 97% in Europe Don't believe in God. On the God gene "Carl Zimmer, writing in Scientific American, questions why "Hamer rushed into print with this book before publishing his results in a credible scientific journal." Scientist PZ Meyer "One thing it isn't is a "god gene". History Channel fails to mention that the scientific community doesn't believe any of this. (Quoted)
ReplyDelete